That's what historical examples from later periods tell us.Ĥ. Realistic female armour is almost identical to male armour. From later periods, we have examples of female armour, and it's basically the same as male armour, adjusted for wider hips and a narrower waist. Armour is meant to deflect blows, not catch them.ģ. Having big globes on the chest creates a space to catch enemy weapons, which defeats the purpose. The globes around her breasts is not something that has ever existed in female armour. Armour is supposed to protect your chest.Ģ. Her whole chest is unprotected which makes this armour pretty useless. IF a woman did wear armour, why would she wear that?ġ. The argument that "women didn't fight so female armour can be anything I say" is silly. If a woman was wearing armour in this time period, she wouldn't be wearing something like this.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |